Defining linked server in a failover cluster

Hi,
Are there any issues to consider when defining a linked
server for a virtual SQL server pointing to another
virtual SQL server in a failover cluster?
Many thanks,
OskarNo. As far as sql concerns, a valid linked server can be either virtual or
physical.
"Oskar" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6bdf01c48362$8b493180$a601280a@.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> Are there any issues to consider when defining a linked
> server for a virtual SQL server pointing to another
> virtual SQL server in a failover cluster?
> --
> Many thanks,
> Oskar
>

Defining linked server in a failover cluster

Hi,
Are there any issues to consider when defining a linked
server for a virtual SQL server pointing to another
virtual SQL server in a failover cluster?
Many thanks,
Oskar
No. As far as sql concerns, a valid linked server can be either virtual or
physical.
"Oskar" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6bdf01c48362$8b493180$a601280a@.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> Are there any issues to consider when defining a linked
> server for a virtual SQL server pointing to another
> virtual SQL server in a failover cluster?
> --
> Many thanks,
> Oskar
>

Defining linked server in a failover cluster

Hi,
Are there any issues to consider when defining a linked
server for a virtual SQL server pointing to another
virtual SQL server in a failover cluster?
--
Many thanks,
OskarNo. As far as sql concerns, a valid linked server can be either virtual or
physical.
"Oskar" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6bdf01c48362$8b493180$a601280a@.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> Are there any issues to consider when defining a linked
> server for a virtual SQL server pointing to another
> virtual SQL server in a failover cluster?
> --
> Many thanks,
> Oskar
>